Using A Generalisation Critic to Find Bisimulations for Coinductive Proofs

نویسندگان

  • Louise A. Dennis
  • Alan Bundy
  • Ian Green
چکیده

Coinduction is a method of growing importance in reasoning about functional languages, due to the increasing prominence of lazy data structures. Through the use of bisimulations and proofs that observational equivalence is a congruence in various domains it can be used to proof the congruence of two processes. Several proof tools have been developed to aid coinductive proofs but all require user interaction. Crucially they require the user to supply an appropriate relation which the system can then prove to be a bisimulation. A method is proposed which uses the idea of proof plans to make a heuristic guess at a suitable relation. If the proof fails for that relation the reasons for failure are analysed using a proof critic and a new relation is proposed to allow the proof to go through.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sound and Complete Equational Reasoning over Comodels

Comodels of Lawvere theories, i.e. models in Set , model state spaces with algebraic access operations. Standard equational reasoning is known to be sound but incomplete for comodels. We give two sound and complete calculi for equational reasoning over comodels: an inductive calculus for equality-on-the-nose, and a coinductive/inductive calculus for equality modulo bisimulation which captures b...

متن کامل

A Logical Step Forward in Parametric Bisimulations

In the last several years, a number of effective methods have been developed for reasoning about program equivalence in higher-order imperative languages like ML. Most recently, we proposed parametric bisimulations (PBs), which fruitfully synthesize the direct coinductive style of bisimulations with the flexible invariants on local state afforded by Kripke logical relations, and which furthermo...

متن کامل

Coinductive Big-Step Operational Semantics

Using a call-by-value functional language as an example, this article illustrates the use of coinductive definitions and proofs in big-step operational semantics, enabling it to describe diverging evaluations in addition to terminating evaluations. We formalize the connections between the coinductive big-step semantics and the standard small-step semantics, proving that both semantics are equiv...

متن کامل

Using Proofs by Coinduction to Find "Traditional" Proofs

In the specific situation of formal reasoning concerned with “regular expression equivalence” we address instances of more general questions such as: how can coinductive argumentation be formalised logically and be applied effectively, as well as how is it linked to traditional forms of proof. For statements expressing that two regular expressions are language equivalent, we demonstrate that pr...

متن کامل

Parametric Bisimulations

In the last several years, a number of effective methods have been developed for reasoning about program equivalence in higher-order imperative languages like ML. Most recently, we proposed relation transition systems (RTSs), which fruitfully synthesize the direct coinductive style of bisimulations with the flexible invariants on local state afforded by Kripke logical relations, and which furth...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997